Friday, January 24, 2020

Life Experiences Are What Makes a Persons Personality Essay -- essays

Life Experiences Are What Makes a Persons Personality An individuals experiences, past and present provide a significant basis for the type of person they will become. Relationships that are established during childhood and adolescence are important for the shaping of someone's personality, as most personality development occurs in the early stages of life. Experiences that someone must deal with in the present sense also contributes to their personality. Dominick Birdsey in Wally Lambs novel I Know This Much Is True, suffered his entire life experiencing every emotion humanly possible in his current stretch of forty five years. The sad and stressful episodes of his life began to take their toll sending Dominick began to grow into a depression and question his reason for living. Dominick Birdsey, his twin brother Thomas, his mother Connie, and stepfather Ray, "Ray is not our real father. We don't know who our real father is. I don't even know if Ma knows." (91) live in Connecticut. Dominick and Thomas had to form an alliance to stand up to Ray, as he had a tendency to use his belt rather than words to punish. He was extremely strict, clearly in charge of the house, and showed little or no emotion, not even towards his wife. As a child of about eight years old, Ray has Dominick and his brother believing that part of being a man is not showing emotion, so the two grow up as little boys feeling very lonely, resulting in a lonely adulthood. The way Dominick remembers his childhood is feeling obligated to frequently rescue his brother from Ray's abuse. Ray was always much harder on Thomas as he felt he was a mamma's boy and had to be toughened up. "These days they called Ray's kind of 'toughening up' child abuse." (63) D... ...realize that all they have is each other. Ray regrets not expressing love towards both his wife and his sons and vows to grow old with Dominick and be the best father he knows how to be for the remainder of his life. Dominick Birdsey was clearly the stronger twin. All his life, from a child to a middle aged man, he had to take care of someone, namely his brother Thomas. It is very difficult to be constantly giving and getting nothing in return as such was the case with Dominick. Finally, to be showed love by Ray, (the one man who Dominick thought was incapable of love) Dominick accomplished a sense of rest and settlement. Perhaps the reason why Dominick was so strong was because he had to be, as people were dependent on him. His childhood and his everyday battles made him the person that he thought he would never become. He was finally in control of his life.

Thursday, January 16, 2020

Tourism’s Potential to Fly South Africa, Clipped by Greed

Upon arrival in the St Lucia-Hluhluwe area (a prime tourism district) for research, I was certain that the beauty of the area had to be shared with family. I started mapping up the possibility of a future family trip back into this area; the accommodation, the feeding arrangements, and other activities offered by the tourist district. Just the basics added up to scaring figures, too big for my working class pocket – and certainly a fortune not any other working class and ordinary South African. I was saddened to realize that tourism (as an intangible consumption) will for a long time remain a luxury, for which, the common man and woman is deliberately priced out (sounds like a conspiracy? ) – for greed and I am not sure what else. Firstly, are the exorbitant prices called for by the operators in the tourist district really called for? Is this the best way to run and grow the tourism industry? All the talk about the tourism industry being an economic sector that could spearhead rural development and reduce poverty in under-privileged communities will remain just that – a talk, until such a time when the pricing issue is resolved. As it stands, South Africa's tourism industry has it all wrong, suffocating its own potential for growth through the greed of a few operators. The pricing regimes of the prime tourism district are obviously meant for the international tourist coming from countries that enjoy a higher currency exchange rate. The logic is to make a killer out of these visitors. In due course, local tourism is highly inhibited and discouraged. It is also very likely that the lower earners from the targeted countries are also denied entry into these high price zones. By so doing, the tourist district creates a muzzle on its potential to grow. It is like clipping a bird's wings for it to fly faster. It is a pity that this kind of logic holds the tourist industry hostage to the whims of a few profiteering individuals and agencies. There is power in numbers. The thousands if not millions of potential tourists who will not visit would calculate to much more profit, more jobs created, and even initiate the growth, vertically and horizontally of other sectors of the economies of the tourist district. At the moment, as a result of restrained demand – the potential for huge demand that necessitates local industrialization and a construction boom as well as expanding the service industry is limited. There are very few visitors, and more so, the numbers fluctuate seasonally. All talks about developing a culture of touring among local people will remain but a pipe dream if the attitude of operators does not change. One operator tried to explain the logic to me; â€Å"lets face it, it is better to deal with smaller groups of people who pay good money and act in a civilized manner than groups of low paying, over-excited bunches who end up fighting and breaking property. As racist as it may sound, my experience with local black visitors – especially those coming in groups have been very rough. When they go – a lot of things must be prepared. † I sympathise but obviously I am not convinced, as this behaviour might be a way of resistance. Probably it is too much to expect that the operators will regulate themselves and reform – the intervention of relevant authorities is therefore called for. The Consumer Council might need to investigate these issues. Besides the denied access to the tourist district, the poor workers and traders trying to earn a living in these areas suffer daily from these chronically high prices. It is actually a blight – that should be remedied, otherwise these ridiculous pricing regimes hold the economy at ransom. Any item from a tooth pick, to whatever is sold gets infected with high prices when it enters this area. Poor people who earn very little to shield the profit margins of operators have to suffer financial erosion from this cancerous pricing regime. The alternative for the poor people trying make a living in this district is to take taxi rides to close towns such as Mtubatuba and Richards Bay, themselves not the cheapest around. More money and time is spent on traveling to buy what one could buy in their own backyard. These people will never taste the cuisines that harass their nose and the children of these people will only but gaze at the children of the privileged riding in cycle tracks, enjoying boat rides and so forth. They are treated to the air, sound and environmental pollution from these activities. There is not need to restrain myself from pointing out that the riding children are white, and those pumping in the dirty dust are black kids. It is a pity that the Black Economic Empowerment train is eluding many black people in the communities in these areas. Black people's involvement is still in the very margins of the industry, even the high sounding Protected Areas Act and Biodiversity Act, as well as the Integrated Management Plan recently promulgated to balance conservation and poverty reduction, will remain a pipe dream if black communities are not put in the mainstream. The so-called community involvement in the sector is in the areas of cultural or ethnic tourism, as well as trekking. Really, the money in the tourism business is not in performing Zulu dancing and story telling. Where the money is in the cottage or accommodation provision, safari tourism, wildlife tourism, of this sector, I did not see any convincing community or individual black entrepreneur's involvement.

Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Act Of Suicide In Hamlet - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 781 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Hamlet Essay William Shakespeare Essay Did you like this example? Suicide is a typical issue some mull over when confronting hardships and inconveniences throughout everyday life. These demonstrations and contemplations are caused by issues of death, tragedy, and sadness which some will be unable to adapt to. A considerable lot of the philosophies that were accepted as of right now were intensely formed by their religious convictions and had serious results. The theme of suicide continuously is talked about in William Shakespeares Hamlet. Hamlet speaks on suicide on more than one occasion. Ophelia actually leads herself to commit the act. Even though the choice of suicide ultimately lies in the hands of the beholder, it is not considered to be a legitimate way out morally or religiously. Hamlet is the protagonist of the play, he is Catholic so committing suicide is definitely against his religion. Yet he is more concerned with what the nobler thing to do is. He believes that committing suicide would not be a noble act because he is lurking for revenge of his fallen father, but he wants to to end the suffering he has. Hamlet is very confused and questions the easy way out. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Act Of Suicide In Hamlet" essay for you Create order Suicide is expressed in hamlet as a result of real emotions. He wants to commit suicide to end all of his pain and suffering but he knows at the same time they would be no justice paid and his father would not be avenged. After the death of her father and the rejection from hamlet Ophelia is driven to insanity and ultimately plunges from a tree branch into the river and drowns. The ghost told him Hamlet to enact his revenge in the opening scenes of the play. He wants to make sure that Claudius did in fact kill his father, so since about trying to figure it out. Claudius is Hamlets uncle, the brother of his Father. Throughout the play Hamlet has many opportunities to kill Claudius but waits for the event moment. Finally, in a duel between Laertes, brother of Ophelia, and Hamlet, Hamlet slips away after killing Laertes and stabs Claudius with the poison sword. Hamlets soliloquy occurs in act one, scene two of the play from lines 333 to 363, and is reproduced in full above. Hamlets soliloquy informs the audience of his intense negative feelings towards his mothers remarriage and highlights the inner turmoil those feelings create within him. In lines 333-334 he says he wishes his body was dissolved into a puddle, basically meaning he doesnt want to exist. In this soliloquy he also talks about how suicide is not an option because its forbidden against god , O that this is too too solid flesh would melt, Thaw, and resolve itself into a dew!. Even though he was very sad about his fathers death he was more upset about his mother not being loyal towards his father. He says, a beast would have even mourned longer.. He is very angry at his mother and somewhat confused but thinks of his mother as being weak, Frailty, thy name is woman!. He closes the soliloquy saying he needs to keep his thoughts to himself. Hamlets second soliloquy occurs in act 3 scene 1, many people are familiar with his words to be or not to be: that it the question. He is basically questioning whether or not life is worth it to keep going, debating suicide. His obstacle, like all who contemplate death, is his fear of the unknown. In essence, dead men tell no tales, thus no matter how hard we try, man will never know what comes after the end of our life. But that the dread of something after death, The undiscoverd country from whose bourn No traveller returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of? Thus conscience does make cowards of us all. If Hamlet proceeds to kill King Claudius, he believes that hell be dead too after killing him, and he is afraid of death because of the unknown consequences he mentions above. That is why is not able to make a decision on whether to execute the Ghosts revenge or to endure his sufferings at this point in the play. Even though he knows suicide isnt the right way out it seems to be the easiest. In conclusion the Shakespearean tragedy hamlet explores many philosopher goal ideologies including the unpardonable act of suicide. Through Hamlets continual contemplation of suicide in your file is active suicide, it can be seen that although it may be seen as the easiest solution the fax can distress those around you. Suicide maybe the easy way out but it provides a permanent solution to a temporary problem.